Slesinski v. Blinken et al
| Pawel Slesinski |
| Antony Blinken and Peggy Petrovich |
| 1:2022cv02624 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal #7 , under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the case is dismissed without prejudice. Status hearing of 07/08/2022 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pawel Slesinski (Provax, Nicole) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Antony Blinken, Peggy Petrovich (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Antony Blinken, Peggy Petrovich (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 07/08/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 06/29/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service including on the appropriate governmental agencies. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (mw, ) (Attachment #1 Status Report Requirement) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Antony Blinken, Peggy Petrovich, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (cm, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Provax, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pawel Slesinski by Nicole Provax (Provax, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Pawel Slesinski; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19478354.(Provax, Nicole) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ey, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
