Olshefski v. Social Security Administration
Priscilla Olshefski |
Social Security Administration |
1:2022cv02681 |
May 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Robert W Gettleman |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice (lma, ) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: No response was filed by the Plaintiff against the government's motion #7 to dismiss. The motion is granted: because the state court would not have had subject matter jurisdiction over the alleged claims, this Court too does not have subject matter jurisdiction. The Plaintiff should follow the administrative and case-filing requirements for challenging a Social Security benefits is she wishes to challenge a benefits determination. The case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A separate AO-450 judgment shall be entered. The tracking status hearing of 07/01/2022 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (lma, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On the government's motion #7 to dismiss, the Plaintiff's response is due by 06/20/2022. The government's reply is due on 07/05/2022. The tracking status hearing of 06/17/2022 is reset to 07/01/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). The status report deadline of 06/08/2022 is vacated. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Social Security Administration to dismiss (Ling, Ernest) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 06/17/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 06/08/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
Filing 4 MAILED Notice of Removal Letter to Priscilla Olshefski (daj, ) |
MAILED Clerk's Notice and Consent Form to Priscilla Olshefski (daj, ) |
Filing 5 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang for all further proceedings. Honorable Robert W. Gettleman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 5/20/2022. (ph, ) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Ernest Yi Ling as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Social Security Administration (Ling, Ernest) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of DuPage County, case number (2022 SC 1371) filed by Social Security Administration Ex. A, state court complaint (Ling, Ernest) |
Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ling, Ernest) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ak, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Olshefski v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Priscilla Olshefski | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Ernest Yi Ling |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.