SprintRay, Inc., a California Company v. Becker
Plaintiff: SprintRay, Inc., a California Company
Defendant: Jay Becker
Case Number: 1:2022cv02692
Filed: May 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jorge L Alonso
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2022 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: A notice of voluntary dismissal has been filed. This case is dismissed without prejudice. Status hearing previously set for 9/7/22 is stricken. Civil case terminated. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, )
June 28, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by SprintRay, Inc., a California Company without Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ Proc. 41 (Dandelles, Stefan)
June 23, 2022 ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendant Jay Becker. (kra, )
June 13, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Jay Becker (emc, )
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration #9 is granted. Plaintiff may proceed on its original complaint. Plaintiff to serve Defendant by 8/6/22. A status hearing is set for 9/7/22 at 9:30 AM. The parties are directed to file a joint status report in accordance with the Court's standing order by 9/2/22. Motion hearing date of 6/9/22 is stricken. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, )
June 6, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff SprintRay, Inc., a California Company for reconsideration (Daugherity, Paul)
June 6, 2022 Filing 8 SprintRay, Inc.'s NOTICE of Motion by Paul Wilson Daugherity for presentment of before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 6/9/2022 at 09:30 AM. (Daugherity, Paul)
May 27, 2022 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: The Court sua sponte dismisses this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's complaint premises subject matter jurisdiction on the diversity jurisdiction statute. To establish diversity jurisdiction, the party asserting jurisdiction must allege, among other things, complete diversity between the plaintiff and defendant. 28 U.S.C. 1332. Here, although Plaintiff adequately alleges its own citizenship, it has not properly alleged the Defendant's citizenship. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant "was a resident of Chicago, Illinois." #1 . But "[c]itizenship depends not on residence but on domicile, which means the place where a person intends to live in the long run." RTP LLC v. ORIX Real Estate Capital, Inc., 827 F.3d 689, 692 (7th Cir. 2016). "We have been told by authority we are powerless to question that when the parties allege residence but not citizenship, the only proper step is to dismiss the litigation for want of jurisdiction." America's Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, the Court dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for want of jurisdiction. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint adequately alleging a basis for jurisdiction. Any such amended complaint shall be filed by June 17, 2022. Mailed notice (ags)
May 23, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxj, )
May 23, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxj, )
May 20, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff SprintRay, Inc., a California Company for preliminary injunction (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Dandelles, Stefan)
May 20, 2022 Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by SprintRay, Inc., a California Company (Dandelles, Stefan)
May 20, 2022 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SprintRay, Inc., a California Company by Stefan R. Dandelles (Dandelles, Stefan)
May 20, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SprintRay, Inc., a California Company by Paul Wilson Daugherity (Daugherity, Paul)
May 20, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Daugherity, Paul)
May 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by SprintRay, Inc., a California Company; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19489534. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Daugherity, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SprintRay, Inc., a California Company v. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SprintRay, Inc., a California Company
Represented By: Stefan R. Dandelles
Represented By: Paul Wilson Daugherity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?