Nasir v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.
Muhammad Nasir, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Donald Blome US Ambassador to Pakistan, Angela Aggler Islamabad Embassy and Richard Visek US Department of State |
Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Embassy-Islamabad Pakistan, Anthony Blinken, U.S. Consul General Donald Blome, Angela Aggler and Richard Visek |
1:2022cv02696 |
May 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Robert Blakey |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the representations in the parties' 7/8/22 status report #13 , Defendants shall respond to the complaint by 8/22/22. The parties shall file an updated status report by 8/31/22 confirming that the certified administrative record either has been filed or will be filed by a date certain. Plaintiff shall also indicate whether he requires discovery beyond the administrative record and, if so, explain what discovery he requires. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 13 STATUS Report Joint Status Report by Muhammad Nasir (Passo, Alexander) |
Filing 12 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Angela Aggler, Anthony Blinken, Donald Blome, Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Embassy-Islamabad Pakistan, Richard Visek (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
Filing 11 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Angela Aggler, Anthony Blinken, Donald Blome, Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Embassy-Islamabad Pakistan, Richard Visek (Oswald, Craig) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Muhammad Nasir as to US Embassy-Islamabad Pakistan on 6/20/2022. (Passo, Alexander) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Muhammad Nasir as to US Citizenship and Immigration Services on 6/21/2022. (Passo, Alexander) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Muhammad Nasir as to Anthony Blinken on 6/21/2022. (Passo, Alexander) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Muhammad Nasir as to Richard Visek on 6/21/2022. (Passo, Alexander) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Muhammad Nasir as to Donald Blome on 6/21/2022. (Passo, Alexander) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Muhammad Nasir as to Department of Homeland Security on 6/21/2022. (Passo, Alexander) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Muhammad Nasir as to Angela Aggler on 6/21/2002. (Passo, Alexander) |
ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendant US Embassy-Islamabad Pakistan. (khg, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Angela Aggler(2 summons and 2 addresses), Anthony Blinken(2 summons and 2 addresses), Donald Blome(2 summons and 2 addresses), Department of Homeland Security(2 summons and 2 addresses), US Citizenship and Immigration Services(2 summons and 2 addresses), US Embassy-Islamabad Pakistan, Richard Visek(2 summons and 2 addresses), U.S. Attorney(khg, ) |
Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 7/8/2022, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312) 818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Passo, Alexander) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Muhammad Nasir; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19490666.(Passo, Alexander) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jk2, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jk2, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.