Cardenas v. The Kroger Co. et al
| Maria Cardenas |
| The Kroger Co., Roundy's Illinois LLC d/b/a Mariano's, Kroger Co., The and Roundy's Illinois, LLC doing business as Mariano's |
| 1:2022cv02737 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Heather K McShain |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge McShain based on the parties' consent #8 , #9 . The Court has reviewed the parties' initial joint status report #7 . The Court will adopt the parties' proposed schedule for fact discovery with a few modifications. First, the Court will not adopt the parties' proposed MIDP date, as that project concluded on 06/01/2020 and cases filed after that date are not governed by the MIDP. Second, the Court notes that the typical sequence of discovery is for Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures to be issued before the parties issue their initial written discovery requests, thus the Court has swapped those deadlines. Fact discovery will therefore proceed as follows: Initial Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures due 07/29/2022; initial written discovery to be issued by 08/12/2022; all fact discovery to be noticed in time to be completed by 11/25/2022. The Court will defer setting an expert discovery and dispositive motion schedule until closer to the completion of fact discovery. By 08/15/2022, the parties shall file a joint status report to update the Court on: (a) the status of written discover; (b) the state of settlement discussions, if any; and (c) any other matters the parties wish to bring to the Court's attention. The parties may contact chambers at any time (by email to Chambers_McShain@ilnd.uscourts.gov) should they be interested in discussing settlement or scheduling a settlement conference. Mailed notice. (pk, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable Heather K. McShain, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings. Honorable Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 06/30/2022. (rc, )
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The parties expressed consent to the magistrate judge as stated in the status report, R. #7 at 4. In response to an inquiry from the courtroom deputy as directed by the Court, the Plaintiff's counsel responded that the consent was for "all" purposes. The Court will process the consent with the Executive Committee. The tracking status hearing of 06/24/2022 for Judge Chang is vacated. Mailed notice (ags) |
| Filing 7 STATUS Report JOINT INITIAL by Kroger Co., The, Roundy's Illinois, LLC (Beegle, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 06/24/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 06/16/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (lxk, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by All Defendants (Beegle, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Roundy's Illinois LLC d/b/a Mariano's, The Kroger Co. by Jennifer R Beegle (Beegle, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Beegle, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of The 12th Judicial Circuit, case number (2022LA000237) filed by Roundy's Illinois LLC d/b/a Mariano's, The Kroger Co. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19496769. (Beegle, Jennifer) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ey, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
