Franklin et al v. Godinez et al
| Janalene Franklin, Marion Thomas and N. M. |
| Manuel Godinez, Gregory Zia, Michael Wilson, Demi Bryant, Regina Gaddy, Daniel Baez, Denise Bernal, Michael Walsh, CITY OF CHICAGO, Timothy Dowdy, Mary Flowers, Unidentified Officers and Unidentified Employees |
| 1:2022cv02886 |
| June 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendant City of Chicago's motion for an extension of time to file responsive pleadings #9 is granted. All named Defendants shall answer or otherwise plead by 9/15/22. The deadline of 8/15/22 for parties to file a joint initial status report #5 is re-set to 9/29/22. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for extension of time (Paglia, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendant Officers Regina Gaddy's and Daniel Baez's first unopposed motion to extend time to answer or otherwise plead #7 is granted. All named Defendants shall answer or otherwise plead by 8/1/22. Joint status report remains due on 8/15/22 #5 . Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION by Defendants Daniel Baez, Regina Gaddy for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (McGee, Michele)
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Daniel Baez, Regina Gaddy by Michele Marie McGee (McGee, Michele)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 8/15/22, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Mitchell Reid Paglia (Paglia, Mitchell)
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, )
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gilbert, Gigi)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Janalene Franklin, N. M., Marion Thomas by Gigi Ann Gilbert (Gilbert, Gigi)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Janalene Franklin; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19522765.(Gilbert, Gigi)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
