Scott v. Lewis et al
| Davonta Scott |
| MARCUS LEWIS, ALEXANDRIA GRIFFIN and Village of Riverdale |
| 1:2022cv02936 |
| June 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
STATUS Report by Alexandria Griffin, Marcus Lewis, Village of Riverdale (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing Notice of Filing)(Wise, John)
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Plaintiff to file a response to defendant Village of Riverdale's motion to dismiss count VI of plaintiff's complaint #14 by 8/19/2022. Defendant to file a reply by 9/2/2022. Once the matter is fully briefed, the Court shall take it under advisement. As this Court's website directs, the parties must provide courtesy copies in hard copy form of all substantive and/or dispositive motions, including the corresponding legal briefs and attachments. Mailed notice. (ym, )
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION by Defendants Village of Riverdale, Alexandria Griffin, Marcus Lewis to dismiss Count VI of Plaintiff's Complaint (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Wise, John)
|
|
Filing 13
Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Alexandria Griffin, Marcus Lewis, Village of Riverdale (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Wise, John)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Defendants' uncontested motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint #10 is granted. Responsive pleading to be filed by 7/21/2022. No appearance necessary on 7/12/2022. Mailed notice. (ym, )
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Motion by Matthew Martin Welch for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #10 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 7/12/2022 at 09:45 AM. (Welch, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION by Defendants Alexandria Griffin, Marcus Lewis, Village of Riverdale for extension of time to file answer (Welch, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Alexandria Griffin, Marcus Lewis, Village of Riverdale by Erin Elizabeth Blake (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Blake, Erin)
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Alexandria Griffin, Marcus Lewis, Village of Riverdale by John Patrick Wise (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Wise, John)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Davonta Scott as to Alexandria Griffin on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. (Bernard, Garth)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Davonta Scott as to Marcus Lewis on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. (Bernard, Garth)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Davonta Scott as to Village of Riverdale on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. (Bernard, Garth)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Telephone status hearing is set for 8/5/2022 at 9:30 AM. The call-in number is (877)336-1829 and the access code is 5205245. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Plaintiff is directed to advise the defendant of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. If the parties agree to consent jurisdiction before the Magistrate Judge, all parties must sign the consent form and electronically file the signed form on the case docket. The court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym, )
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Alexandria Griffin, Marcus Lewis, Village of Riverdale (emc, )
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Davonta Scott by Garth Nathaniel Bernard (Bernard, Garth)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bernard, Garth)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Davonta Scott; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19534878.(Bernard, Garth)
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
