DeLoach v. Deere & Co.
| Gary DeLoach |
| Deere & Company, dba John Deere Company and Deere & Co. doing business as John Deere |
| 1:2022cv02945 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Marvin E Aspen |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 TRANSFERRED the case record to the Western Division 22cv50228. (jp, ) |
| Filing 9 DIVISIONAL TRANSFER Notice. Case transferred to Western Division - Rockford. (jp, ) |
| Filing 8 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that Iain D. Johnston is presiding in MDL 3030 (In Re: Deere & Company Repair Services Antitrust Litigation); and It further appearing that, 22 cv 2945, DeLoach v. Deere & Co., is currently pending before the Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, falls within the scope of MDL 3030; and It further appearing that 22 cv 2945, DeLoach v. Deere & Co., is related to MDL 3030 (22 cv 50188) and should be designated as part of the MDL proceeding; therefore It is hereby ordered that the Clerk is to transfer and reassign case 22 cv 2945, DeLoach v. Deere & Co., to Judge Johnston and Magistrate Judge Jensen in the Western Division, and that it be designated as part of MDL 3030 and related to Master Docket Case 22 cv 50188. Signed by the Executive Committee on 6/24/2022. (jp, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Deere & Co. for extension of time to file answer (Unopposed) (Maslar, Amanda) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Deere & Co. of Motion to Transfer Related Cases for Consolidated Proceedings (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Deere's Motion to Transfer Related Cases for Consolidated Proceedings, #2 Exhibit B. Deere's Notice of Potential Tag-Along Action)(Maslar, Amanda) |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Deere & Co. (Maslar, Amanda) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Deere & Co. by Amanda Balos Maslar (Maslar, Amanda) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gary DeLoach as to Gary DeLoach on 6/7/2022, answer due 6/28/2022. (O'Connor, Bryan) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen: Initial status hearing is set for 8/18/2022 at 10:30 a.m. Mailed notice (ags) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (CLASS ACTION) filed by Gary DeLoach; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19534382. (Civil Cover Sheet) (O'Connor, Bryan) (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office on 6/7/2022) (jg, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Deere & Company, dba John Deere Company (khg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
