Hearn v. EYM Pizza of Illinois, LLC et al
| Amondo Hearn |
| EYM Pizza of Illinois, LLC and Eduardo Diaz |
| 1:2022cv02970 |
| June 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: No initial status report was filed (it was due on 07/28/2022). R. 3. The status report deadline is reset to 08/10/2022. If the Plaintiff fails to file the status report on time, then the case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Also, the Civil Rule 4(m) period for service of process expires on 09/06/2022. The tracking status hearing of 08/05/2022 is reset to 08/19/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Due to a Scrivener's error, the Courts minute entry dated 06/15/2022, R.2, is corrected to reflect the initial tracking status hearing is set for 08/05/2022 at 8:30 a.m. and the joint status report is due 07/28/2022. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 07/28/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 08/05/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Amondo Hearn; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19538838. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent to be a Party Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons - EYM Pizza of Illinois, LLC, #4 Summons - Eduardo Diaz)(Mccarley, Matthew) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
