Leguizamon v. Goldberg et al
| Lina Marcela Ramirez Leguizamon |
| Philip S. Goldberg and Antony Blinken |
| 1:2022cv03022 |
| June 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lina Marcela Ramirez Leguizamon as to Antony Blinken served on 7/25/2022, answer due 9/23/2022; Philip S. Goldberg served on 7/25/2022, answer due 9/23/2022 (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Antony Blinken, Philip S. Goldberg (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Antony Blinken, Philip S. Goldberg (Oswald, Craig) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (kra, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 6/16/2022: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 8/23/2022 at 9:50 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than ten days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice(ef, )
|
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lina Marcela Ramirez Leguizamon by Joshua Laban Goldstein (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS filed by Lina Marcela Ramirez Leguizamon; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19547450.(Goldstein, Joshua) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
