McCoy v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
Latrice McCoy |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Unknown Amtrak Operator |
1:2022cv03133 |
June 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Latrice McCoy by Robert J. Napleton (Napleton, Robert) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule as to the motion to compel arbitration #12 : Plaintiff's response is due by 8/16/2022; Amtrak's reply is due by 8/30/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation to compel CONTESTED MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS THE COMPLAINT (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Laing, Susan) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Agreed motion for extension of time to answer #10 is granted. Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation is to file its responsive pleading by 7/11/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation for extension of time to file answer AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (Laing, Susan) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Correction (jmk, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jmk, ) |
Filing 8 MAILED Rule 77d letter to Attorney of Record. (gcy, ) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation by Matthias D. Gill (Gill, Matthias) |
ENTERED in error. Modified on 6/17/2022 (jmk, ). |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 8/24/2022, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service PROOF OF FILING COPY OF FILED NOTICE OF REMOVAL IN CIRCUIT COURT by Susan Kay Laing on behalf of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Laing, Susan) |
Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Laing, Susan) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation by Susan Kay Laing (Laing, Susan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Laing, Susan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2022 L 003549) filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19563959. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Laing, Susan) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.