Andriola v. Kijakazi
| Matthew Andriola |
| Acting Cm'r SSA Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2022cv03158 |
| June 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jeffrey Cummings |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings: The Court's prior order setting the deadline for the filing of the administrative record #9 is amended as follows. The government is directed to send a copy of the administrative record to plaintiff by 9/1/22. The government need not file the record on the docket at this time, but must instead file a notice of service. This notice will serve as the government's answer. This procedure obviates the need for the government to file the administrative record - which typically includes volumes of medical records - on the docket if if voluntarily remands the case. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due by 11/4/22. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing the final agency decision must include a section with a recitation of the relevant facts and a separate section identifying the statement of the issues presented in the brief. The statement of issues must set out a numbered list of issues for the court's consideration. The issue statement must also identify with specificity the aspects of the Commissioner's final decision that plaintiff challenges, along with a concise explanation of why plaintiff believes the challenged aspects are unsupported by substantial evidence. The government's response and/or cross-motion for summary judgment is due by 1/6/23. In the argument section of its response, the government must address each issue plaintiff identifies in his or her brief's statement of the issues. The government must also file the administrative record on the docket and deliver a paper copy of the record to chambers on the same date it files its response and/or cross motion. Plaintiff may file a reply by 1/20/23, but one is not required. Mailed notice (sxw) |
| Filing 10 COMPLAINT filed by Matthew Andriola. (ph, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cummings. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. Defendant to file administrative record by 9/1/22. The Court will set a briefing schedule after the record has been filed. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Goldbloom, Marcie) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Kurt N. Lindland as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Lindland, Kurt) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Andriola by Elise D Crawley (Crawley, Elise) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Andriola by Beth A. Alpert (Alpert, Beth) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Matthew Andriola for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Goldbloom, Marcie) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Andriola by Marcie E. Goldbloom (Goldbloom, Marcie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Goldbloom, Marcie) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and by Matthew Andriola (Goldbloom, Marcie) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (khg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 40.3(C), this case has been directly assigned to the Magistrate Judge who previously remanded a related case filed by Plaintiff. If Plaintiff and Defendant consent to have the Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including the entry of final judgment, they must execute and file a # Consent# form. If an executed Consent form is not filed within 60 days of this notice, the case will be reassigned to the District Judge to whom the prior related case was originally assigned. (khg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
