Farmer et al v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Steven Farmer and Amanda Farmer |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC and Trans Union LLC |
| 1:2022cv03353 |
| June 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan B Gottschall |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: As plaintiffs request in their notice of settlement #13 as to Equifax Information Services, LLC ("Equifax"), all outstanding deadlines as to Equifax are stayed. Since plaintiffs have announced settlement with both defendants, the 9/23/2022 deadline to file a status report regarding co-defendant Trans Union LLC is stricken. If this case has not been dismissed pursuant to settlement by 10/31/2022, a status report is due on that date. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Settlement as to Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC ONLY by Amanda Farmer, Steven Farmer (Chami, Tarek) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: As plaintiffs request in their notice of settlement #11 as to Trans Union LLC ("Trans Union"), all outstanding deadlines as to Trans Union are stayed. Plaintiffs represent that they intend to file a notice of dismissal as to Trans Union within 45 days. They are advised that the Seventh Circuit has held that the proper way to drop fewer than all parties is to amend the complaint. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857-58 (7th Cir. 2015) (citing Berthold Types Ltd. v. Adobe Sys. Inc., 242 F.3d 772, 777 (7th Cir. 2001) (other citation omitted)). On or before 9/23/2022, plaintiffs must file either a status report on their settlement with Trans Union or a motion for leave to file an amended complaint dropping Trans Union. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Settlement as to Defendant Trans Union LLC Only by Amanda Farmer, Steven Farmer (Chami, Tarek) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: The consent motion #8 of defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC, for an extension to and including 8/16/2022 of its deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is granted. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Hill, Adam) |
| Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Equifax Information Services, LLC (Hill, Adam) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC by Adam Theodore Hill (Hill, Adam) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Farmer, Amanda Farmer as to Equifax Information Services, LLC on 7/5/2022, answer due 7/26/2022. (Chami, Tarek) |
Filing 5
ORDER: An initial status report and, if appropriate, case management plan is due on or before August 31, 2022. In conformity with General Order 21-0027 and due to the need for social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, this court is ordering written status reports instead of routine oral status hearings. This includes initial status hearings and scheduling conferences under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). See Judge Gottschall's website for the procedure for requesting a hearing and for requirements for status reports and discovery plans during the COVID-19 pandemic. No Rule 26(f) discovery plan should be submitted until all defendants have been served. If all defendants have not been served by the deadline for filing an initial status report, the report should so state and propose a deadline for filing a discovery plan. The parties are directed to discuss settlement and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. They are further directed to meet and confer regarding a proposed discovery plan. See Judge Gottschall's civil case management packet regarding pretrial case management procedures at: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 6/28/2022. Mailed notice(mjc, )
|
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union LLC (emc, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Amanda Farmer, Steven Farmer by Syed Haseeb Hussain (Hussain, Syed) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Amanda Farmer, Steven Farmer by Tarek Najib Chami (Chami, Tarek) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Chami, Tarek) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Steven Farmer, Amanda Farmer; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19599455.(Chami, Tarek) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kra, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
