Etheridge v. Midland Paper Supplies and Packing Company
| Richard A Etheridge |
| Midland Paper Supplies and Packing Company |
| 1:2022cv03401 |
| June 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Plaintiff is given to and including 8/26/2022 to amend the complaint. Telephone status hearing set for 8/5/2022 is stricken. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 11 EXHIBITS by Plaintiff Richard A Etheridge (cxr, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER: The Court denies pro se plaintiff Richard Etheridge's motion for attorney representation #5 . After screening Etheridge's complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), the Court dismisses the complaint #1 with leave to amend. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 7/20/2022. Mailed notice. (ym, )
|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Because Plaintiff paid the filing fee 6 , his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is denied as moot. Motion for attorney representation #5 is taken under advisement. No appearance necessary on 7/13/2022. Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), the Court can review a pro se plaintiff's claims to determine whether the action he alleges is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or if it is seeking damages from a defendant who is immune. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). Telephone status hearing set for 8/5/2022 at 10:45 AM to permit review of Plaintiff's claims. The call-in number is (877)336-1829 and the access code is 5205245. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Presentment of plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 and motion for attorney representation #5 is set for 7/13/2022 at 9:30 AM by telephone conference. The call-in number is (877)336-1829 and the access code is 5205245. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Richard A Etheridge for attorney representation (cxr, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Richard A Etheridge for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (cxr, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Richard A Etheridge (cxr, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (cxr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard A Etheridge (Exhibits) (cxr, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cxr, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Midland Paper Supplies and Packing Company (cxr, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Richard A Etheridge (cxr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Etheridge v. Midland Paper Supplies and Packing Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard A Etheridge | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Midland Paper Supplies and Packing Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
