Moore v. Illinois Board of Election et al
Gregg Moore |
Illinois Board of Election, Ian K. Linnabary and Darien Bailey |
1:2022cv03432 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Virginia M Kendall |
Civil Rights: Voting |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Plaintiff's Motion for reconsideration #16 is granted. Plaintiff's petition to proceed IFP #3 is dismissed as moot. Case is reinstated and reopened. Due to clerical error, the Court did not notice Plaintiff paid the filing fee. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff Gregg Moore to re-consider. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
Filing 15 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 7/26/2022. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 is denied. Because Plaintiff fails to state a upon which relief may be granted, the Court dismisses the Complaint #1 . See Order for further details. Mailed notice(lk, ) |
Filing 13 PLAINTIFF does not cosent by Gregg Moore (Exhibits). (lxk, ) |
Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Gregg Moore regarding summons served on David Lam on 7/11/2022 (exr, ) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregg Moore as to Darien Bailey on 7/11/2022, answer due 8/1/2022. (exr, ) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregg Moore as to Illinois Board of Election on 7/8/2022, answer due 7/29/2022. (exr, ) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregg Moore as to Ian K. Linnabary on 7/11/2022, answer due 8/1/2022. (exr, ) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Darien Bailey, Illinois Board of Election, Ian K. Linnabary (exr, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial Status hearing set for 9/28/2022 at 9:00 AM which will proceed via Webex. Joint Status Report due by 9/23/2022. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Webex instructions are as follows: Prior to the hearing, you are directed to cut and paste this hyper link into a browser: https://us-courts.webex.com/join/virginia_kendallilnd.uscourts.gov If you do not have access to a computer Dial: (650)-479-3207, the access code is: 180 698 4009. Given the increased volume of users that is anticipated, you are directed to mute your phone and turn off your video until your case is called. If calling in due to not having access to a computer, please remember to SAY YOUR NAME EACH TIME YOU SPEAK so that the record of the proceedings is accurate. You are directed not to use the speaker phone function. Please test the sound quality and video functions of your device in advance. Members of the public and media are directed to call in to listen to hearings. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Participant instructions for Webex are attached. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Webex Participant Instructions) (lk, ) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT filed by Gregg Moore (Exhibits) (exr, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Gregg Moore for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (cxr, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (cxr, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Gregg Moore (Exhibits) (cxr, ) |
MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Gregg Moore (cxr, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cxr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.