ND Products, Inc. v. Does 1-127
| ND Products, Inc. |
| Does 1-127 |
| 1:2022cv03444 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE by Plaintiff ND Products, Inc. to set deadlines,,, #11 (Keener, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court has reviewed the pending motions and complaint. The Court orders Plaintiff to file a brief addressing the issue of joinder of all of the defendants on or before 08/19/2022. If Plaintiff contends, in the memorandum addressing joinder, that joinder is proper for only some of the defendants listed on Plaintiff's Schedule A, Plaintiff must accordingly file an amended Schedule A and a revised TRO motion which pertains only to the defendants listed in the amended Schedule A. Plaintiff must also submit an amended proposed order pertaining to the defendants listed in the amended Schedule A. The Court will issue a ruling on the pending motions via CM/ECF after the supplemental brief addressing joinder is filed. Mailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 10 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff ND Products, Inc. Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for TRO (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Plaintiff, #2 Declaration of Kevin Keener, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Kevin Keener, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Kevin Keener, #5 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Kevin Keener, #6 Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Kevin Keener)(Keener, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff ND Products, Inc. for temporary restraining order asset restraining order, expedited discovery order, and service of process by email (Keener, Kevin) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff ND Products, Inc. for leave to file excess pages for Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support for TRO (Keener, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff ND Products, Inc. to seal document sealed document #6 Exhibits 2, 3, and 4 to Complaint, Memorandum In Support of Motion for TRO (Keener, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff ND Products, Inc. Exhibit 2- part 1 of 3 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2- part 2 of 3, #2 Exhibit 2- part 3 of 3, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Keener, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 MAILED PATENT report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (cxr, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 09/14/2022 the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Mailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff ND Products, Inc. by Kevin John Keener (Keener, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Keener, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by ND Products, Inc.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19615302. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, 3, and 4 under seal)(Keener, Kevin) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ey, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ND Products, Inc. v. Does 1-127 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ND Products, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kevin John Keener |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does 1-127 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
