Holmes v. Kelley et al
| Ralph T. Holmes, Sr. |
| Mike Kelley, Santerelli, V. Perillo, Well Path, Kim Young and Regal |
| 1:2022cv03488 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ralph T. Holmes, Sr for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (Attachments: #1 Circuit Court Order for Waiver of Court Fees) (Envelope postmarked 08/24/2022) (rc, ) |
| Filing 6 MAIL RETURNED, for document #3 , sent to Ralph T. Holmes returned as undeliverable, return to sender. No new contact information received; therefore future mailings will not be sent until a new address is provided to the Clerk's Office using a Notification of Change of Address or Pro Se Appearance form (Attachments: #1 Additional returned mail) (ph, ) |
| MAILED Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a copy of order #3 dated 7/28/2022. (ph, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff has submitted a complaint #1 but did not prepay the filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. By August 31, 2022, Plaintiff must either: (1) submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that includes a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint and a completed certification from the appropriate official of each prison where Plaintiff is or was confined during the last six months; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $402. If he does not comply, the Court will summarily dismiss this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 7/28/2022. Mailed notice (ph, )
|
| Filing 5 PROOF of Service by Ralph T. Holmes, Sr. (Envelope postmark 7/14/2022) (Received for docketing 7/28/2022) (ph, ) |
| Filing 4 PROOF of Service by Ralph T. Holmes, Sr. (Envelope postmark 7/14/2022) (Received for docketing 7/28/2022) (ph, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Ralph T. Holmes, Sr. (ph, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ph, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ph, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Ralph T. Holmes, Sr. (Envelope postmark 6/30/2022) (ph, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ph, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
