Whalum et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
| Ashley Whalum and Shirley Glenn |
| Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Edward Jacob |
| 1:2022cv03521 |
| July 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Based on plaintiff's status report, the telephonic status hearing set for 9/12/2022 is vacated and reset to 10/20/2022 at 9:05 a.m., using the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. The joint status report required by the Court's initial order is to be filed by 10/13/2022. (mk) |
| Filing 6 STATUS Report by Shirley Glenn (Buckley, Meredith) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Illinois Department of Corrections, Edward Jacob, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. (jb, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: By no later than 9/6/2022, the parties (or, if no defendant has yet appeared, the plaintiff(s)) are to file a joint status report that includes the following information: (1) the status of service of process upon each defendant; (2) a description of each party's claims and defenses; (3) details regarding any discussions concerning settlement, whether before or after the filing of the lawsuit; (4) a proposed discovery and pretrial schedule; and (5) any other matters that any party wishes to bring to the Court's attention. The case is set for a case management conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 on 9/12/2022 at 8:55 a.m. The case management conference will be conducted by telephone, using the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to provide a copy of this order to any defendant that has not yet appeared by counsel via regular mail at the address at which the defendant has been or is to be served with process. (mk) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Shirley Glenn, Ashley Whalum by Meredith Walsh Buckley (Buckley, Meredith) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Shirley Glenn, Ashley Whalum by Seth Robert Halpern (Halpern, Seth) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Halpern, Seth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Ashley Whalum, Shirley Glenn; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19629465.(Halpern, Seth) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
