Rabi et al v. Dahleh et al
Jawad Rabi and ZRM Enterprises |
Gus Dahleh, Kyndra Mayo, CDM Investors LLC and NPI Debt Fund II, LP |
1:2022cv03551 |
July 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Contract: Insurance |
18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 10, given the anticipated dismissal motions and the motions' likely nature, discovery is paused during the pendency of the motions. With the 09/26/2022 responsive pleading deadline / dismissal motions, the Plaintiffs' response is due by 10/26/2022. The defense replies are due by 11/16/2022. The tracking status hearing of 09/02/2022 is reset to 01/13/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants CDM Investors LLC, Gus Dahleh, Kyndra Mayo by Zachary R. Clark (Clark, Zachary) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants CDM Investors LLC, Gus Dahleh, Kyndra Mayo by Ryan S. Hedges (Hedges, Ryan) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants CDM Investors LLC, Gus Dahleh, Kyndra Mayo by Brian W. Ledebuhr (Ledebuhr, Brian) |
Filing 10 STATUS Report Initial Joint Status Report by Jawad Rabi, ZRM Enterprises (Knight, Emily) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant NPI Debt Fund II, LP by Matthew John McQuaid (McQuaid, Matthew) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant NPI Debt Fund II, LP by James L. Kopecky (Kopecky, James) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Jawad Rabi, ZRM Enterprises by James Robert Shultz (Shultz, James) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Jawad Rabi, ZRM Enterprises by Emily Starr Knight (Knight, Emily) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 09/02/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 08/25/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Gus Dahleh, Kyndra Mayo, NPI Debt Fund II, LP (dxb, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant CDM Investors LLC (ak, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Jawad Rabi, ZRM Enterprises by Ashley W. Brandt (Brandt, Ashley) |
Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Jawad Rabi, ZRM Enterprises (Brandt, Ashley) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Brandt, Ashley) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jawad Rabi, ZRM Enterprises; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19633776. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Unanimous Written Consent Sole Member, #2 Exhibit Second Amended Operating Agreement, #3 Exhibit Executed IL SOS Application for Admission, #4 Exhibit 12/31/18 WI Annual Report, #5 Exhibit 12/31/19 WI Annual Report, #6 Exhibit 12/31/20 WI Annual Report, #7 Exhibit 4/22/19 IL Annual Report, #8 Exhibit 6/12/20 IL Annual Report, #9 Exhibit 3/30/21 IL Annual Report, #10 Exhibit Deed to the Property, #11 Exhibit 2018 Mortgage from ZRM to Grand Ridge, #12 Exhibit 2018 Assignment of Rents from ZRM to Grand Ridge, #13 Exhibit 2021 Modification of Mortgage from ZRM to Grand Ridge, #14 Exhibit 2021 Assignment of Rents from ZRM to Grand Ridge, #15 Exhibit 2021 Release of Mortgage from ZRM to Grand Ridge, #16 Exhibit 12/17/21 Articles of Amendment, #17 Exhibit 12/20/21 Annual Report WI, #18 Exhibit 12/20/21 Articles of Correction WI, #19 Exhibit 2/25/22 Annual Report, #20 Exhibit 3/3/22 Articles of Amendment, #21 Exhibit Forged Operating Agreement, #22 Exhibit CDM Articles of Organization, #23 Exhibit Mortgage Reported on Busse Property)(Brandt, Ashley) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ey, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.