Onaga v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
Fabian Okechukwu Onaga |
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Ur Jaddou and Kevin Riddle |
1:2022cv03614 |
July 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Manish S Shah |
Naturalization Application |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's response to the motion to remand is due 9/13/22. That is enough time for plaintiff to file a response to the issue raised by the motion. The government may reply by 9/20/22. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM by Ur Jaddou, Kevin Riddle, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in support of motion to remand #11 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Oswald, Craig) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendants Ur Jaddou, Kevin Riddle, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to remand Opposed (Oswald, Craig) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fabian Okechukwu Onaga as to Kevin Riddle served on 8/15/2022, answer due 10/14/2022 (Jarecki, Michael) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fabian Okechukwu Onaga (Jarecki, Michael) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fabian Okechukwu Onaga (Jarecki, Michael) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fabian Okechukwu Onaga as to All Defendants (Jarecki, Michael) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fabian Okechukwu Onaga as to All Defendants (Jarecki, Michael) |
Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Ur Jaddou, Kevin Riddle, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) (Oswald, Craig) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: By 9/12/22, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (ey, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ey, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Ur Jaddou, Kevin Riddle, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (ey, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Fabian Okechukwu Onaga by Michael R Jarecki (Jarecki, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Jarecki, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Fabian Okechukwu Onaga; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19644174. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-4, #2 Exhibit Exhibits 5-7, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 8)(Jarecki, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.