Murphy v. Wilks et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Murphy
Defendant: Justin Wilks, Lt. Nolan and Morris
Case Number: 1:2022cv03673
Filed: July 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sara L Ellis
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2022 Filing 6 STATUS Request from Joseph Murphy. Mailed Docket Entry of Status Request to Joseph Murphy (No envelope provided, postmark not available) (jxj, )
August 29, 2022 MAILED Mailed Docket Entry of entry #5 Status Request to Plaintiff Joseph Murphy (jxj, )
July 21, 2022 Filing 5 STATUS Request by Joseph Murphy. Mailed Docket Entry of Case Assignment to Joseph Murphy (ak, )
July 15, 2022 MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Joseph Murphy. (jh, )
July 15, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jh, )
July 14, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Joseph Murphy for attorney representation. (Exhibits) (jh, )
July 14, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION and APPLICATION by Plaintiff Joseph Murphy to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs. (Exhibits) (jh, )
July 14, 2022 Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, )
July 14, 2022 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Joseph Murphy. (Exhibits) (jh, )
July 14, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy v. Wilks et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Wilks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?