Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG et al
Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC |
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and BMW of North America, LLC |
1:2022cv03804 |
July 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Steven C Seeger |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on defendant's motion to dismiss (Dckt. No. #18 ). Plaintiff's response is due by October 13, 2022. Defendant's reply is due by October 27, 2022. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The motion for leave to appear pro hac vice (Dckt. No. #17 ) is granted. Attorney Brian Biggs is added as counsel for BMW of North America, LLC. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 20 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by BMW of North America, LLC (Steadman, Paul) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM by BMW of North America, LLC in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #18 - Opening Brief In Support Of BMW Of North America, LLC's Motion To Dismiss Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC's Complaint - (Steadman, Paul) |
Filing 18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC (Steadman, Paul) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19841146. on behalf of BMW of North America, LLC (Biggs, Brian) |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant BMW of North America, LLC by Paul R. Steadman (Steadman, Paul) |
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion to withdraw the return of executed summons (Dckt. No. #13 ) is hereby granted. The return of summons (Dckt. No. #8 ) is hereby withdrawn. Plaintiff then filed a new return of summons (Dckt. No. #14 ). So, as the Court understands the lay of the land, Defendant Bayerische Motoren Werke, AG was, in fact, served with process. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC as to Bayerische Motoren Werke AG on 8/31/2022, answer due 9/21/2022. (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC to withdraw summons returned executed #8 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Correction regarding #11 (exr, ) |
Filing 11 ENTERED IN ERROR Modified on 9/1/2022 (exr, ). |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The agreed motion for initial extension of time to answer (Dckt. No. #9 ) is granted. Defendant shall respond to plaintiff's complaint by September 14, 2022. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint, #1 to September 14, 2022. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC as to Bayerische Motoren Werke AG on 8/12/2022, answer due 9/2/2022. (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 7 MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (jh, ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by October 10, 2022. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC as to BMW of North America, LLC on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC by Neil A Benchell (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Benchell, Neil) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michigan Motor Technologies, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19674201. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12)(Benchell, Neil) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ak, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants BMW of North America, LLC, Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (ak, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.