Broom Designs LLC v. W.W. Grainger, Inc. et al
| Broom Designs LLC |
| W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Newell Brands, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv03844 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by W.W. Grainger, Inc.(Leonard, Robert) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Newell Brands, Inc.(Leonard, Robert) |
| Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Motions by counsel for leave to appear pro hac vice #16 #17 are granted. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 20 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Newell Brands, Inc., W.W. Grainger, Inc. by Patrick Patras (Patras, Patrick) |
| Filing 19 Defendant Newell Brand, Inc's L.R. 3.2 Notice of Affiliates by Newell Brands, Inc. (Cyrluk, Jonathan) |
| Filing 18 Defendant W.W. Grainger, Inc's L.R. 3.2 Notice of Affiliates by W.W. Grainger, Inc. (Cyrluk, Jonathan) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19769621. (Carlin, Gregory) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19769557. (Leonard, Robert) |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Newell Brands, Inc., W.W. Grainger, Inc. by Jonathan M. Cyrluk (Cyrluk, Jonathan) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendants' Motion for extension of time to answer #13 is granted. Defendants must answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint on or before 9/14/2022. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendants Newell Brands, Inc., W.W. Grainger, Inc. for extension of time to file answer UNOPPOSED (Moeller, Steven) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Newell Brands, Inc., W.W. Grainger, Inc. by Steven Christopher Moeller (Moeller, Steven) |
Filing 11
ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/5/2022: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 10/7/2022 at 9:00 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than ten days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking.Mailed notice(ef, )
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Broom Designs LLC as to Newell Brands, Inc. on 7/29/2022, answer due 8/19/2022. (Irwin, Barry) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Broom Designs LLC as to W.W. Grainger, Inc. on 7/28/2022, answer due 8/18/2022. (Irwin, Barry) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Newell Brands, Inc., W.W. Grainger, Inc. (ey, ) |
| Filing 8 MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (jn, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lw, ) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Claims Involving Patents or Trademarks by Broom Designs LLC (Irwin, Barry) |
| Filing 6 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Broom Designs LLC (Irwin, Barry) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Broom Designs LLC by Daniel Sokoloff (Sokoloff, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Broom Designs LLC by Iftekhar Ahmad Zaim (Zaim, Iftekhar) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Broom Designs LLC by Barry F. Irwin (Irwin, Barry) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Irwin, Barry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Broom Designs LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19680686. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P)(Irwin, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
