Ramones v. Kelley et al
| Matthew P. Ramones |
| Mike Kelley, Will County Adult Detention Facility Administrator, Dale Santerilli, Vincent Perillo, Tony Richards, Wellpath Medical Administrator, Jennifer Brisko, Kim Young, A. Shalabi, R. Hoch, T. Filus and Terrence Williams |
| 1:2022cv03871 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 LETTER from Matthew P. Ramones dated 09/17/2022. (Envelope dated 09/19/2022) (daj, ) |
| MAILED copy of order #7 to Matthew P. Ramones. (daj, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff submitted an undated complaint #1 that arrived on July 26, 2022, in an envelope without a postmark. He did not pre-pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis (in other words, request permission to pay the filing fee in installments). Plaintiff initiated a prior lawsuit where he also submitted a complaint without addressing his fee status. Ramones v. Kelley, Case No. 22 C 3072 (N.D. Ill.) ("Ramones I"). In Ramones I, on June 24, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to prepay the fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis and warned him that his lawsuit would be dismissed if he failed to comply. Id., Dkt. 3. Since Plaintiff was advised of this information in Ramones I, it is unclear why he again initiated litigation without attempting to address his fee status. As he decides how to proceed, he should reread the June 24, 2022 order in Ramones I, which contains information about inmate filing fee obligations. For this case, Plaintiff must either: (1) pre-pay the full $402 filing fee; or (2) submit a properly supported application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. If he does not do so by September 26, 2022, the Court will summarily dismiss this case. Plaintiff is placed on notice that if he initiates additional litigation, he must pay the full $402 filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis when he submits his complaint. If he fails to comply, his new lawsuit will be subject to summary dismissal without prejudice to refiling, and he will be liable for the filing fee in both the dismissed and refiled cases. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 8/25/2022: Mailed notice (daj, )
|
| Filing 6 STATEMENT by Matthew P. Ramones. (Envelope postmarked 08/15/2022) (daj, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's letter dated August 1, 2022 #4 is before the Court. Plaintiff has inquired about forms he believes that "all the parties" need to sign. He previously submitted two magistrate judge consent forms #3 with the names of the Defendants printed on the lines provided for the parties to print and sign their names. Plaintiff is advised that that he may consent to have a magistrate judge preside over this case, rather than this Court. However, he may not consent on behalf of another party. Regardless of whether Plaintiff consents, this case will remain before the Court unless all the parties consent. Defendants have no obligation to take any action at this point because, among other things, the Court has not yet addressed Plaintiff's fee status or decided if he may proceed with his complaint. The Court will issue an order addressing Plaintiff's fee status in the normal course. He should be aware that regardless of the outcome of this litigation, he will be required to pay the filing fee, either upfront or over time, as waiver of the filing fee is not an option, even if a litigant is in custody. Other than updating his address if it changes, no action by Plaintiff is necessary at this time. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Matthew P. Ramones dated 08/01/2022. (Envelope not postmarked) (daj, ) |
| Filing 3 RECEIVED CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge. (Not Signed) (daj, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (daj, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and zero copies by Matthew P. Ramones. (Envelope not postmarked) (daj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (daj, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (daj, ) |
| MAILED Clerk's Notice Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1 (b), Consent Form to Matthew P. Ramones (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
