Arability IP LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC
| Arability IP LLC |
| Motorola Mobility LLC |
| 1:2022cv03889 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The plaintiff's agreed motion, on behalf of the defendant, for an extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #7 is granted. The defendant's responsive pleading is due by 10/24/2022. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Arability IP LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Agreed) (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arability IP LLC by David Randolph Bennett (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 5 MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (rc, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Arability IP LLC (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arability IP LLC by Steven G Kalberg (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed by Arability IP LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19687368. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A United States Patent No. 11,262,908)(Kalberg, Steven) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jk2, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jk2, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arability IP LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arability IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Steven G Kalberg |
| Represented By: | David Randolph Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Motorola Mobility LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
