Marquez v. Kijakazi
| Kilyam Marquez |
| Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2022cv03982 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sheila M Finnegan |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit)(Phillip, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Mailed notice (sxw)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #6 is granted. This action (1) is neither frivolous nor malicious; (2) states a claim on which relief may be granted; and (3) seeks damages against a defendant who is not immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). See also Manning v. Arizona, No. 12 C 1019, 2012 WL 1161506, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 9, 2012). In addition, the facts set forth in Plaintiff's affidavit demonstrate that Plaintiff has met the burden of establishing indigence. Mailed notice (sxw)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 73.1. Parties have consented to the reassignment. Honorable Martha M. Pacold no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 8/18/22.(gcy, )
|
|
Filing 10
JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Marvin, Cody)
|
|
Filing 9
DESIGNATION of Danielle Anne Phillip as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Phillip, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 9/6/2022, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating whether they agree to a remand and whether they consent to reassignment for all purposes to the Magistrate Judge. With respect to scheduling, the parties shall comply with Local Rule 16.4. Mailed notice (ber, )
|
|
Filing 7
The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (lm, London)
|
|
Filing 6
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kilyam Marquez for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Marvin, Cody)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kilyam Marquez by Cody Thomas Marvin (Marvin, Cody)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marvin, Cody)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT filed by Kilyam Marquez; (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Marvin, Cody)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Correction regarding lanham notification #1 . (rc, )
|
|
Filing 1
Entered in Error. (rc, ) Modified on 8/1/2022 (rc, ).
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, London)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, London)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marquez v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kilyam Marquez | |
| Represented By: | Cody Thomas Marvin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Danielle Anne Phillip |
| Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
