Smith et al v. Garland et al
| Joshua Taylor Smith and Kevi Begolli |
| Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray, Antony Blinken, Gentry Smith, David L Cohen and Ana Escrogima |
| 1:2022cv04090 |
| August 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles R Norgle |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Antony Blinken, David L Cohen, Ana Escrogima, Merrick Garland, Gentry Smith, Christopher Wray (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Antony Blinken, David L Cohen, Ana Escrogima, Merrick Garland, Gentry Smith, Christopher Wray (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Attorney Shabnam Lotfi's motion to appear pro hac vice #5 on behalf of the plaintiffs is granted. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19728257. (Lotfi, Shabnam) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Antony Blinken, David L Cohen, Ana Escrogima, Merrick Garland, Gentry Smith, Christopher Wray, and U.S. Attorney (sxh, ) |
| Filing 4 Exhibits A-G by Kevi Begolli, Joshua Taylor Smith (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Mcclure, Lauren) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Kevi Begolli, Joshua Taylor Smith by Lauren Elizabeth Mcclure (Mcclure, Lauren) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mcclure, Lauren) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF UNDER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT filed by Joshua Taylor Smith; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19715735.(Mcclure, Lauren) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, ) |
| SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gentry Smith, Merrick Garland, David L Cohen, Kevi Begolli, Ana Escrogima, Joshua Taylor Smith, Christopher Wray, Antony Blinken as to Gentry Smith served on 8/5/2022, answer due 10/4/2022; Merrick Garland served on 8/5/2022, answer due 10/4/2022; David L Cohen served on 8/5/2022, answer due 10/4/2022; Kevi Begolli served on 8/5/2022, answer due 10/4/2022; Ana Escrogima served on 8/5/2022, answer due 10/4/2022; Joshua Taylor Smith served on 8/5/2022, answer due 10/4/2022; Christopher Wray served on 8/5/2022, answer due 10/4/2022; Antony Blinken served on 8/5/2022, answer due 10/4/2022. ENTERED IN ERROR. (smb, ) Modified on 8/8/2022 (sxh, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
