Legacy Roofing and Restoration, LLC v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Legacy Roofing and Restoration, LLC |
The Cincinnati Insurance Company |
1:2022cv04130 |
August 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Jorge L Alonso |
Gabriel A Fuentes |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Legacy Roofing and Restoration, LLC by James Forry (Forry, James) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: This matter coming before the magistrate judge on referral (doc. #11) for discovery supervision and settlement, the Court has reviewed the parties' status report (doc. #9), and no adjustments are made to the district court's discovery schedule. No expert discovery schedule has yet been entered, and the Court defers expert discovery scheduling for now. The parties are further directed to review the Court's Standing Order for Civil Cases Before Magistrate Judge Fuentes and the Top Ten Ways to Defeat Settlement, both available on the Court's website. A further joint written status report is due by noon on 2/23/23 concerning progress toward closure of fact discovery, a proposed expert discovery schedule, and whether there is mutual interest in participating in a settlement conference before the magistrate judge. If the parties at any time decide they wish to engage in a settlement conference, they may contact the courtroom deputy, Jenny Jauregui, at 312-818-6514, to initiate the scheduling process. Mailed notice (sxw) |
Filing 11 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision; settlement conference.(lf, )Notice mailed by Judge's staff. |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Telephonic status hearing held. Plaintiff's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #8 is granted. Attorney James Forry is given leave to file an appearance on behalf of Plaintiff. The Court adopts the discovery deadlines set forth in the parties' joint status report. The parties rule 26(a)(1) disclosures shall be served by 9/15/22. The deadline for amendment of pleadings and joinder of parties is 10/14/22. All fact discovery shall be noticed in time to be completed by 3/31/23. The parties' dispositive motions shall be filed by 11/1/23. This case is referred to the magistrate judge for discovery supervision with the authority to set and extend deadlines, and a settlement conference. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) |
Filing 9 STATUS Report JOINT STATUS REPORT by The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Dolan, Dennis) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19794156. (Forry, James) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Telephonic Status hearing set for 9/6/22 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 9/1/22. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 888-808-6929 and the access code is 4911854. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company by Shadi Blanche (Blanche, Shadi) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint CINCINNATI'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by The Cincinnati Insurance Company(Dolan, Dennis) |
Filing 4 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (aee, ) |
Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Dolan, Dennis) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company by Dennis Michael Dolan (Dolan, Dennis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT NOTICE OF REMOVAL FROM STATE COURT filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19718920. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Waiver of Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Dolan, Dennis) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jb, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.