Cardona v. Albany Restaurant, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Wilfredo Miranda Cardona
Defendant: Albany Restaurant, Inc., Peking Mandarin Restaurant and Chih Hui Yu
Case Number: 1:2022cv04208
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Steven C Seeger
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2022 Filing 9 DEFENDANTS' ANSWER to Complaint by Albany Restaurant, Inc.(Qiu, Peter)
September 9, 2022 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Albany Restaurant, Inc., Peking Mandarin Restaurant, Chih Hui Yu by Peter Y. Qiu (Qiu, Peter)
August 17, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wilfredo Miranda Cardona as to Chih Hui Yu on 8/17/2022, answer due 9/7/2022. (Nolan, Timothy)
August 17, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wilfredo Miranda Cardona as to Peking Mandarin Restaurant on 8/17/2022, answer due 9/7/2022. (Nolan, Timothy)
August 17, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wilfredo Miranda Cardona as to Albany Restaurant, Inc. on 8/17/2022, answer due 9/7/2022. (Nolan, Timothy)
August 10, 2022 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by October 24, 2022. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
August 10, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wilfredo Miranda Cardona by Timothy Michael Nolan (Nolan, Timothy)
August 10, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Nolan, Timothy)
August 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Wilfredo Miranda Cardona; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19729855. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Nolan, Timothy)
August 10, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Albany Restaurant, Inc., Peking Mandarin Restaurant, Chih Hui Yu (mbh, )
August 10, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, )
August 10, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cardona v. Albany Restaurant, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilfredo Miranda Cardona
Represented By: Timothy Michael Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Albany Restaurant, Inc.
Represented By: Peter Y. Qiu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peking Mandarin Restaurant
Represented By: Peter Y. Qiu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chih Hui Yu
Represented By: Peter Y. Qiu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?