Eloisa v. Samcent, Inc. et al
Jacinto Eloisa |
Samcent, Inc. d/b/a The Howard Street Inn, Ken Hoffman and Samcent, Inc. doing business as The Howard Street Inn |
1:2022cv04219 |
August 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 6, the Plaintiff reports that the case has settled and the parties are reducing the agreement to writing. The tracking status hearing of 10/07/2022 is reset to 11/18/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the dismissal shall be filed by 11/10/2022, or else the shall file a detailed status report on the settlement. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 6 STATUS Report by Jacinto Eloisa (Dore, James) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jacinto Eloisa as to Samcent, Inc. on 8/30/2022, answer due 9/20/2022. (Dore, James) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Jacinto Eloisa as to Ken Hoffman. (Dore, James) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Ken Hoffman, Samcent, Inc. (smb, ) |
Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 10/07/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 09/29/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mbh, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mbh, ) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jacinto Eloisa by James Dore (Dore, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jacinto Eloisa; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19731621. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Dore, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.