Marazas v. Menards, Inc., et al
| Judith Marazas |
| MENARD, INC.,, Menards, Inc. and Menards Home Improvment, Inc |
| 1:2022cv04246 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Susan E Cox |
| Martha M Pacold |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE Order Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 9/15/2022.(rbf, ) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: Agreed Motion for Qualified HIPAA Protective Order #14 is granted. The Court has reviewed the parties' joint status report. They do not want a settlement conference at this time. The status report does not provide much information on what discovery the parties have completed at this point. The parties are ordered to file an updated joint status report on 10/17/22 that includes a more detailed discussion of the progress of fact discovery. Enter Qualified Protective Order. (rbf, ) |
| Filing 15 STATUS Report Joint by Menards, Inc. (Andrews, W.) |
| Filing 14 MOTION by Defendant Menards, Inc. for protective order Qualified HIPPA (Andrews, W.) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: The Court has reviewed the parties' Rule 26(f) planning report. The Court sets a fact discovery deadline of 5/1/2023. It is not the Court's practice to subdivide fact discovery into smaller deadlines, set deadlines beyond the fact discovery deadline, or set expert discovery deadlines until it becomes clear that the fact deadline will be met. The Court also will not divide fact discovery into liability/damages phases as the parties suggest, but the parties may choose to use their discovery time as they see fit. Any extensions of the fact discovery deadline will need to be on a separate written motion for good cause shown; the parties should work diligently to complete all fact discovery within the deadline and be proactive in enforcing any third party subpoenas. The parties do not wish to schedule a settlement conference at this time. The parties are ordered to file an updated joint status report on 12/9/2022 informing the Court of the progress of fact discovery and stating whether the parties believe a settlement conference would be fruitful at that time. (rbf, ) |
| Filing 12 STATUS Report of Parties' Planning Meeting by Menards, Inc. (Andrews, W.) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox: This case has been referred to Judge Cox for discovery supervision and a settlement conference. The parties are ordered to file a Rule 26(f) planning report (https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_judges/COX/RptToPty.pdf) on or before 9/6/22. (rbf, ) |
| Filing 10 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Susan E. Cox for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision and scheduling, to set a deadline to file amended pleadings, to set a dispositive motions schedule, and for settlement. (rao, ) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Judith Marazas by Daniel Walker, Jr (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing Notice of Filing)(Walker, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 Menard, Inc's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Menards, Inc.(Andrews, W.) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 9/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Outline for the Initial Joint Status Report) (rao, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Menards, Inc. by John Edward Motylinski (Motylinski, John) |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by All Defendants (Andrews, W.) |
| Filing 4 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record.(cxr, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Andrews, W.) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant MENARD, INC., by W. Anthony Andrews (Andrews, W.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Will County, case number (2022-LM-85) filed by MENARD, INC., Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19734740. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Andrews, W.) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
