Coss et al v. Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff: Adrian Coss and Maribel Ocampo
Defendant: Walmart, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv04277
Filed: August 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Nancy L Maldonado
Referring Judge: Mary M Rowland
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2022 Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: Defendant's motion for extension of time until 10/27/22 to file an answer 15] is granted. (ca, )
October 5, 2022 Filing 16 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Walmart, Inc. (Rhodes, Michael)
October 5, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant Walmart, Inc. for extension of time to file response/reply Walmart Inc.'s Second Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Answer Complaint (Rhodes, Michael)
October 3, 2022 Filing 14 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: GENERAL ORDER 22-0018: Pursuant that to the Executive Committee Order entered on September 9, 2022, the civil cases on the attached list have been selected for reassignment to form the initial calendar of the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado; therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the attached list of 287 cases be reassigned to the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties affected by this Order must review the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado's webpage on the Court's website for the purpose of reviewing instructions regarding scheduling and case management procedures; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any civil case that has been reassigned pursuant to this Order will not be randomly reassigned to create the initial calendar of a new district judge for twelve months from the date of this Order; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado to the Court's civil case assignment system during the next business day, so that she shall receive a full share of such case; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado to the Court's criminal case assignment system ninety (90) days so that Judge Maldonado shall thereafter receive a full share of such cases. Case reassigned to the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado for all further proceedings. Honorable Mary M. Rowland no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 10/03/2022.(sm, )
September 15, 2022 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Motion to appear pro hac vice by Darina A. Shtrakhman #12 is granted. Counsel is reminded to become familiar with this court's local rules (including the rules requiring local counsel and describing this court's trial bar). Mailed notice. (dm, )
September 14, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19838209. (Shtrakhman, Darina)
September 14, 2022 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Motions to appear pro hac vice by Michael G. Rhodes #7 , Whitty Somvichian #8 , and Kyle C. Wong #9 are granted. Counsel are reminded to become familiar with this court's local rules (including the rules requiring local counsel and describing this court's trial bar). Mailed notice. (dm, )
September 13, 2022 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendant's unopposed motion to extend time to respond to complaint #6 is granted. Defendant's response is due 10/13/22. Mailed notice. (dm, )
September 13, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19834472. (Wong, Kyle)
September 13, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19834410. (Somvichian, Whitty)
September 13, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19834374. (Rhodes, Michael)
September 13, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Walmart, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Defendant Walmart Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (Earles, Robert)
September 13, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Walmart, Inc. by Robert E. Earles (Earles, Robert)
September 6, 2022 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 10/26/22, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, )
August 24, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adrian Coss, Maribel Ocampo as to Walmart, Inc. on 8/23/2022, answer due 9/13/2022. (Vlahakis, James)
August 15, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Walmart, Inc. (jg, )
August 12, 2022 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Adrian Coss, Maribel Ocampo by James C. Vlahakis (Vlahakis, James)
August 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Adrian Coss, Maribel Ocampo; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19739651. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vlahakis, James)
August 12, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, )
August 12, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coss et al v. Walmart, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adrian Coss
Represented By: James C. Vlahakis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maribel Ocampo
Represented By: James C. Vlahakis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart, Inc.
Represented By: Robert E. Earles
Represented By: Darina A. Shtrakhman
Represented By: Kyle Wong
Represented By: Michael G Rhodes
Represented By: Whitty Somvichian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?