Muhammad v. Equifax et al
Plaintiff: Patricia Muhammad
Defendant: Equifax, Experian and Transunion
Case Number: 1:2022cv04331
Filed: August 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Mary M Rowland
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2022 Filing 7 MAILED copy of Order dated 10/6/2022 #6 and a blank pro se complaint form to the Plaintiff Patricia Muhammad (cxr, )
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff Patricia Muhammad brings this pro se lawsuit against defendants Equifax, Experian and Transunion under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Dkt. 1. Before the court is Plaintiff's renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). For the reasons explained herein, Plaintiff's IFP application #5 is granted. However, upon initial review of Plaintiff's complaint, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has until October 27, 2022 to file an amended complaint that strictly complies with this Order. The Clerk is directed to provide this order and a blank pro se complaint form to the plaintiff. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 10/6/2022. Mailed notice (cxr, )
September 14, 2022 Filing 5 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Patricia Muhammad for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (cxr, )
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Plaintiff Patricia Muhammad's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied. By September 15, 2022, Muhammad is directed to either (1) submit a renewed application curing the issues outlined in this order; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00. If Muhammad does not either submit a new IFP application or pay the filing fee by September 15, 2022, this case may be summarily dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to send this order, along with an updated IFP application to Plaintiff. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 8/24/2022. Mailed notice (cxr, )
August 24, 2022 EMAILED copy of Order dated 8/24/2022 and IFP application to Plaintiff Patricia Muhammad (cxr, ) Modified on 8/24/2022 (cxr, ).
August 17, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jh, )
August 16, 2022 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Patricia Muhammad for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jh, )
August 16, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, )
August 16, 2022 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Patricia Muhammad. (Exhibits) (Attachments: #1 Envelope Postmarked 8/10/2022) (jh, )
August 16, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey I. Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muhammad v. Equifax et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Muhammad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Transunion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?