Langston v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
Shaming Langston |
Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago |
1:2022cv04371 |
August 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John F Kness |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 794 Rehabilitation Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: In view of the pending motion to dismiss #10 and the accompanying briefing schedule #11 , the Court, at its own instance, resets the 10/4/2022 status hearing to 11/29/2022 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: A briefing schedule is set on defendant's motion to dismiss #10 as follows : plaintiff's response due 10/28/2022; defendant's reply due 11/14/2022. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Mincy, J) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 9/16/2022: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 10/4/2022 at 10:00 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than ten days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice(ef, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant's Motion for extension of time #7 is granted. Defendant must answer or otherwise plead on or before 9/26/2022. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago for extension of time to File Its Motion to Dismiss (Mincy, J) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago by Elizabeth Kathleen Barton (Barton, Elizabeth) |
Filing 4 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (daj, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (daj, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago by J Ernest Mincy, III (Mincy, J) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mincy, J) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Illinois, County Dept. Law Div, case number (2021 L 008340) filed by Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Mincy, J) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Shelia M. Finnegan. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Langston v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shaming Langston | |
Represented By: | Donald Jaburek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago | |
Represented By: | J Ernest Mincy, III |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Kathleen Barton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.