Kirchwehm et al v. Bisco Industries, Inc.
| Kurt Kirchwehm and Roselia Contreras |
| Bisco Industries, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv04398 |
| August 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by Bisco Industries, Inc.(Makinen, Eric) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendant's first unopposed motion for extension of time (DCkt. No. #10 ) is granted. Defendant shall respond to plaintiffs' complaint by October 13, 2022. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Bisco Industries, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Defendant's First Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time) (Makinen, Eric) |
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Bisco Industries, Inc. (Makinen, Eric) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Bisco Industries, Inc. by Eric Michael Makinen (Makinen, Eric) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Bisco Industries, Inc. by Sari M. Alamuddin (Alamuddin, Sari) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kurt Kirchwehm, Roselia Contreras as to Bisco Industries, Inc. on 8/23/2022, answer due 9/13/2022. (Martin, Alexis) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by November 2, 2022. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Roselia Contreras, Kurt Kirchwehm by Katherine Eileen Stryker (Stryker, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Roselia Contreras, Kurt Kirchwehm by Alexis D Martin (Martin, Alexis) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Martin, Alexis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kurt Kirchwehm, Roselia Contreras; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BILNDC-19756652. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Martin, Alexis) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Bisco Industries, Inc. (mbh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
