Cervantes v. 5 Brothers, Inc. d/b/a Capri Ristorante et al
Felipe Cervantes |
5 Brothers, Inc. d/b/a Capri Ristorante, Filippo Rovito and Daniela Mancuso |
1:2022cv04408 |
August 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Felipe Cervantes as to Daniela Mancuso on 10/7/2022, answer due 10/28/2022. (Dore, James) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Felipe Cervantes (Dore, James) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Felipe Cervantes (Dore, James) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Daniela Mancuso (emc, ) |
Filing 8 AMENDED complaint by Felipe Cervantes against Daniela Mancuso (Schlade, Daniel) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff's motion to file amended complaint #6 is granted. Plaintiff shall file the amended complaint as a separate docket entry. Defendants 5 Brothers, Inc., dba Capri Ristorante and Filippo Rovito are dismissed without prejudice. Joint Initial Status report remains due on 11/1/22. #3 Plaintiff should report on service on the newly named defendant if that has not been accomplished by that date. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Felipe Cervantes for leave to file Amended Complaint (Schlade, Daniel) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Felipe Cervantes as to Filippo Rovito on 9/10/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (Dore, James) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Felipe Cervantes as to 5 Brothers, Inc. d/b/a Capri Ristorante on 9/10/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (Dore, James) |
Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 11/1/22, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants 5 Brothers, Inc. d/b/a Capri Ristorante, Filippo Rovito (lm, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jk2, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jk2, ) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Felipe Cervantes by Daniel I Schlade (Schlade, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Felipe Cervantes; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19758392. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Schlade, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.