Strong v. Consumer Financial Services, Corp. et al
| Nathan Strong |
| Consumer Financial Services, Corp. and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 1:2022cv04500 |
| August 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nathan Strong As to Defendant Consumer Financial Services, Corp. ONLY (Hussain, Syed) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court are the parties' separate notices of settlement #12 #13 as to both Defendants. Because the parties have reported that they are finalizing settlements, all existing deadlines are stricken, and the case is stayed pending the filing of a stipulation of dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The status hearing set for 10/27/2022 is reset to 11/21/2022 at 09:30 AM; that hearing will be stricken if a stipulation of dismissal is filed in advance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Settlement as to Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC by Nathan Strong (Hussain, Syed) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Settlement as to Defendant Consumer Financial Services, Corp. by Nathan Strong (Chami, Tarek) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nathan Strong as to Consumer Financial Services, Corp. on 9/1/2022, answer due 9/22/2022. (Chami, Tarek) |
Filing 10
ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 9/16/2022: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 10/27/2022 at 9:50 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than ten days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice(ef, )
|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant's Motion for extension of time #6 is granted. Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC must answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint on or before 10/11/2022. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC by Kevin M. Hogan (Hogan, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Equifax Information Services, LLC (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (unopposed) (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC by Rodney L. Lewis (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nathan Strong as to Equifax Information Services, LLC on 8/30/2022, answer due 9/20/2022. (Chami, Tarek) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Consumer Financial Services, Corp., Equifax Information Services, LLC (smb, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nathan Strong by Syed Haseeb Hussain (Hussain, Syed) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nathan Strong by Tarek Najib Chami (Chami, Tarek) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nathan Strong; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19772884. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chami, Tarek) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
