Aharon v. Babu et al
| Refael Aharon |
| Susany Babu, Sonu Abraham, Yvonne Wheeler-Northcutt, William Bill and William Gill |
| 1:2022cv04502 |
| August 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Defendants have not yet filed appearances in this case. The 11/3/2022 joint status report deadline is extended to 12/19/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing 10
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by U.S. Marshal's as to William Gill waiver sent on 10/5/2022, answer due 12/5/2022. (gw, )
|
|
EMAILED USM 285 forms to the U.S. Marshall office. (daj, )
|
|
SUMMONS Issued, certified copy of order dated 08/25/2022 to the U.S. Marshal's Office for service as to Defendants Sonu Abraham, Susany Babu, William Gill, Yvonne Wheeler-Northcutt via email. (daj, )
|
|
MAILED copy of order (7), USM 285 forms to Rafael Aharon. (daj, )
|
|
Filing 8
COMPLAINT filed by Refael Aharon. (Exhibits) (daj, )
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The Clerk is directed to file Plaintiff's complaint and issue summons for service of the complaint on the defendants. The United States Marshals Service is appointed to serve the defendants. The Court advises the plaintiff that a completed USM-285 (Marshals service) form is required for service on each defendant. The Clerk is directed to provide a USM-285 form to the plaintiff along with a copy of this order. The Marshal will not attempt service on the defendants unless and until the required form is received. Therefore, the plaintiff must complete a service form for each defendant and return the form to the Clerk of Court. By 11/3/2022, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing 6
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin for all further proceedings. Honorable Robert W. Gettleman no longer assigned to the case pursuant to 28:294(b). Signed by Executive Committee on 08/25/2022.(daj, )
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Refael Aharon for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (daj, )
|
|
Filing 3
PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Refael Aharon. (daj, )
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (daj, )
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIVED Complaint by Refael Aharon. (Exhibits) (daj, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, )
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (daj, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
