Lomax v. MLC Properties & Mgmt. Inc. et al
| Mattie Lomax |
| MLC Properties & Mgmt. Inc. and Ivy Park |
| 1:2022cv04527 |
| August 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry Plaintiff Mattie Lomax (Lomax) has filed a Complaint #1 , a motion for a First Amended Complaint #11 , two separate IFP applications #3 #10 , and a motion for attorney representation #4 . For the reasons stated herein, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Lomax's applications to proceed IFP #3 #10 are denied as moot and Lomax's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice. Lomax must file an amended complaint and a renewed in forma pauperis petition consistent with this Order by 11/17/2022. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the case. The Court recommends that Lomax utilize the resources provided by the U.S. District Court Hibbler Memorial Pro Se Assistance Program in preparing an amended complaint, which can be found here: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Pages.aspx?/2+UWDbtVzCDq3Lu8BusuQ==. Mailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the Court's previous order #13 , Plaintiff's motion for leave to file #11 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Combine Case Filed on 09/09/2022 #12 is denied because Plaintiff appears to be asking the Court to combine a case that is already before the Court involving the Plaintiff's landlord-tenant dispute. The Court also strikes the consent to proceed before the magistrate judge #7 , as that filing needs to be a joint filing agreed upon by all parties. Defendants have not appeared on this case because the Court has denied Plaintiff's IFP applications. To help clarify the record, the Court repeats the first paragraph of its previous order about Plaintiff's IFP applications #13 in the next minute entry. Mailed notice (axc). |
Filing 13
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 10/4/2022. Mailed notice (lxk, )
|
| Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Mattie Lomax to combine case filed on September 9, 2022/Plaintiff's motion to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) (Exhibits). (lxk, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Mattie Lomax. (jh, ) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Mattie Lomax for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jh, ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing by Mattie Lomax re Received Amended Complaint #8 . (jh, ) |
| Filing 8 RECEIVED Amended Complaint by Mattie Lomax. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
| Filing 7 RECEIVED JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff. (jh, ) |
| Filing 6 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Mattie Lomax. (jh, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Correction regarding received complaint #1 . (jn, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent form to Plaintiff Mattie Lomax (jn, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Mattie Lomax for attorney representation. (jn, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Mattie Lomax for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jn, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 1 copy by Mattie Lomax. (Exhibits). (jn, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/26/2022) (jn, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
