Lester-Zwilling v. Lester et al
Plaintiff: Lori Lester-Zwilling
Defendant: William J Lester and Steven D Lester
Case Number: 1:2022cv04648
Filed: August 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Manish S Shah
Nature of Suit: Contract: Stockholders Suits
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2022 Filing 14 ANSWER to counterclaim for Declaratory Judgment by Lori Lester-Zwilling(LUBIN, PETER)
October 19, 2022 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The parties shall exchange initial disclosures by 11/21/22 and all fact discovery must be noticed in time for completion by 6/1/23. Any requests to amend the pleadings must be made by 3/8/23. The court will set expert discovery and dispositive motion deadlines when the parties get closer to completing fact discovery. An agreed proposed confidentiality order may be submitted to proposed_order_shah@ilnd.uscourts.gov. The parties may contact susan_mcclintic@ilnd.uscourts.gov for a settlement referral. The court will not immediately refer the case to the magistrate judge for settlement unless both sides agree to an immediate referral. The parties shall file a status report on discovery progress on 1/24/23. Notices mailed. (psm, )
October 18, 2022 Filing 12 STATUS Report - Initial Joint by Lori Lester-Zwilling (Irion, Susan)
October 4, 2022 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: By 10/18/22, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, )
October 3, 2022 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint , Affirmative Defenses, and COUNTERCLAIM filed by Steven D Lester, William J Lester against Lori Lester-Zwilling for Declaratory Judgment. by Steven D Lester, William J Lester (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Buy/Sell Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - 2-22-2022 Schedule A)(Killacky, John)
October 3, 2022 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Steven D Lester, William J Lester by John Patrick Killacky (Killacky, John)
September 26, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lori Lester-Zwilling as to William J Lester on 9/14/2022, answer due 10/5/2022. (LUBIN, PETER)
September 26, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lori Lester-Zwilling as to Steven D Lester on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (LUBIN, PETER)
August 31, 2022 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Lester-Zwilling by Susan Irion (Irion, Susan)
August 31, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Lester-Zwilling by Patrick Doyle Austermuehle (Austermuehle, Patrick)
August 31, 2022 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Lester-Zwilling by PETER S. LUBIN (LUBIN, PETER)
August 31, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lori Lester-Zwilling by Terrence Buehler (Buehler, Terrence)
August 31, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Buehler, Terrence)
August 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lori Lester-Zwilling; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19794780.(Buehler, Terrence)
August 31, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Steven D Lester, William J Lester (lm, )
August 31, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, )
August 31, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lester-Zwilling v. Lester et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Lester-Zwilling
Represented By: PETER S. LUBIN
Represented By: Patrick Doyle Austermuehle
Represented By: Susan Irion
Represented By: Terrence Buehler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William J Lester
Represented By: John Patrick Killacky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven D Lester
Represented By: John Patrick Killacky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?