Jodicke v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
| Jonas Sebastian Jodicke |
| The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 1:2022cv04684 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 MAILED copyright report with certified copy of minute order dated 10/20/2022 to Registrar, Washington DC (jn, ) |
| Filing 30 ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed by the courtroom deputy on 10/20/2022. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 29 DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 10/20/2022. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of no timely answer, the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment #26 is granted. Because the default established willfulness, a permanent injunction is appropriate. As explained in the Order, the requested damages award of $15,000 per Defendant is reasonable. A separate AO-450 judgment shall be entered. The tracking status hearing of 10/21/2022 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 27 MEMORANDUM by Jonas Sebastian Jodicke in support of motion for default judgment #26 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 26 MOTION by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke for default judgment as to The Defendants Identified In [Amended] Schedule A (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 25 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 09/12/2022. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the facts that justified the entry of the TRO, the motion for preliminary injunction #21 is granted. The extension motion on the TRO, R. 20, is terminated as moot. Given the answer deadline of 10/03/2022, the parties shall file a joint initial status report on 10/07/2022. If no answer is filed by 10/03/2022, then the Defendants shall be deemed in default and the Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment on 10/07/2022. The tracking status hearing of 09/16/2022 is reset to 10/21/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) (Attachment: #1 Status Report Requirement) |
| Filing 23 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jonas Sebastian Jodicke as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Service)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM by Jonas Sebastian Jodicke in support of motion for preliminary injunction #21 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #2 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Keith Vogt)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 21 MOTION by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke for preliminary injunction (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 20 MOTION by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke for extension of time for Temporary Restraining Order (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 19 SURETY BOND in the amount of $10,000.00 posted by Jonas Sebastian Jodicke (Document Not Scanned) (kl, ) |
| Filing 18 MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC (Attachments: #1 (List of Copyrights - Ex. 1)) (ph, ) |
| Filing 17 (PUBLIC VERSION) - SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 09/02/2022. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 16 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 09/02/2022. Emailed notice (mw, ) Modified on 9/16/2022 (jn, ). |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In this copyright-infringement case, the Plaintiff's motion 12 for temporary restraining order and other relief is granted. An order will be entered under seal separately. Although the Court again expresses its concern about restraining assets before judgment, Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo v. Alliance Bond Fund, 527 U.S. 308, 331 (1999), the Plaintiff does invoke a statutory remedy, namely, an accounting of profits (that is, disgorgement of profits) under 17 U.S.C. 504(b), which is not a mere common-law equitable claim and thus could allow for pre-judgment restraint. Indeed, copyright owners need only prove "the infringer's gross revenue"; the defendant must prove expenses. 17 U.S.C. 504(b). To the extent that the restraint might be too broad, the Defendant may appear and file challenges to the scope of the TRO. The balance of factors tips in favor of Plaintiff being able to freeze the assets without advance warning to the Defendant, who likely would seek to transfer the money elsewhere. The Plaintiff's motion #10 for leave to file under seal is granted in light of the asset-restraint goal. The Plaintiff's motion #11 for extra pages is granted. To track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called), a status hearing is set for 09/16/2022 at 8:30 a.m.. The Plaintiff shall file the TRO extension motion (or a preliminary injunction motion) no later than 09/09/2022. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A (ak, ) |
| Filing 14 EXHIBIT 2 by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke to the declaration of Jonas Sebastian Jodicke in support of memorandum in support of Plaintiff's EX PARTE motion for entry of a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and service of process by e-mail and/or electronic publication regarding memorandum in support of motion, #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2-1, #2 Exhibit 2-2)(Vogt, Keith) Modified on 9/16/2022 (jn, ). |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in support of 12 Exparte Motion (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #2 Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration, #3 Declaration of Jonas Sebastian Jodicke, #4 Exhibit 1, of Jonas Sebastian Jodicke's declaration)(Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke for leave to file excess pages (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke for leave to file under seal (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 9 (AMENDED) Schedule A to Complaint by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke [Amended] Schedule A to Complaint (1) and Schedule A to Complaint (2) (Vogt, Keith) Modified on 9/16/2022 (jn, ). |
| Filing 8 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (smb, ) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Adam Grodman (Grodman, Adam) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke Schedule A to Complaint (1) (Vogt, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jonas Sebastian Jodicke; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19800242. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Vogt, Keith) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jodicke v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonas Sebastian Jodicke | |
| Represented By: | Adam Grodman |
| Represented By: | Yanling Jiang |
| Represented By: | Yi Bu |
| Represented By: | Keith A. Vogt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
