Markham v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Marilyn L Markham
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2022cv04696
Filed: September 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Referring Judge: Sheila M Finnegan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2022 Filing 12 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Claus, Michael)
September 14, 2022 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown.Mailed notice (sxw, )
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Judge Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 9/13/2022. (kl, )
September 13, 2022 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction, R. 8, the status hearing with Judge Chang of 10/21/2022 is vacated. The consent will be processed with the Executive Committee. Emailed notice (mw, )
September 12, 2022 Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Olinsky, Howard)
September 12, 2022 Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Michael D. Claus as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Claus, Michael)
September 2, 2022 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis #3 , in light of financial indigency, including based on the family circumstances cited in the application, the motion is granted. The Court recommends that the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, but of course a decision not to consent will have no adverse substantive consequences. By 10/13/2022, the parties shall file a joint status report on the timing of the filing of the administrative record. To track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called), a status hearing is set for 10/21/2022 at 8:30 a.m. Emailed notice (mw, )
September 1, 2022 Filing 5 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (smb, )
September 1, 2022 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marilyn L Markham by Howard D. Olinsky (Olinsky, Howard)
September 1, 2022 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Marilyn L Markham for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Olinsky, Howard)
September 1, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Olinsky, Howard)
September 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marilyn L Markham; (Olinsky, Howard)
September 1, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Shelia M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, )
September 1, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Markham v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marilyn L Markham
Represented By: Howard D. Olinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Michael D. Claus
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?