Markham v. Commissioner of Social Security
Marilyn L Markham |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2022cv04696 |
September 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Sheila M Finnegan |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Claus, Michael) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown.Mailed notice (sxw, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Judge Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 9/13/2022. (kl, ) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction, R. 8, the status hearing with Judge Chang of 10/21/2022 is vacated. The consent will be processed with the Executive Committee. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Michael D. Claus as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Claus, Michael) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis #3 , in light of financial indigency, including based on the family circumstances cited in the application, the motion is granted. The Court recommends that the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, but of course a decision not to consent will have no adverse substantive consequences. By 10/13/2022, the parties shall file a joint status report on the timing of the filing of the administrative record. To track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called), a status hearing is set for 10/21/2022 at 8:30 a.m. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
Filing 5 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (smb, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marilyn L Markham by Howard D. Olinsky (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Marilyn L Markham for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marilyn L Markham; (Olinsky, Howard) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Shelia M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Markham v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marilyn L Markham | |
Represented By: | Howard D. Olinsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Michael D. Claus |
Represented By: | AUSA-SSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.