Roofers' Pension Fund et al v. D&M SERVICE GROUP LLC
| Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund and United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11 |
| D&M SERVICE GROUP LLC |
| 1:2022cv04722 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a) #11 . The Court denies the motion #11 without prejudice for the following reasons: (1) The summons returned executed states only that the summons was served [11-1] at 4; (2) It is unclear from the summons returned executed whether Devin Baalman, the individual on whom the summons was served, is a supervisor for D&M Service Group (D&M) or United States Corporation Agents, Inc. (the registered agent of D&M), or at what address Devin Baalman was served. Any renewed motion should include an updated certificate of service addressing the aforementioned issues. Mailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiffs Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11 for entry of default as to D&M Service Group LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit 2 - Kansas Business Entity Website)(Kratochvil, Karsyn) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund as to D&M SERVICE GROUP LLC on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (Kratochvil, Karsyn) |
| Filing 9 REFUND PROCESSED re REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of $402.00, receipt no. AILNDC-19805273 #8 . (lw, ) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of $402.00, receipt no. AILNDC-19805273, regarding complaint,, #1 ROOFERS' PENSION FUND, et al., v. D&M SERVICE GROUP LLC (Kratochvil, Karsyn) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant D&M SERVICE GROUP LLC (smb, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 11/16/2022 the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Mailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 6 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by All Plaintiffs (Kratochvil, Karsyn) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11 by Jeffrey Allen Krol (Krol, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11 by William M. Blumthal, Jr (Blumthal, William) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11 by Karsyn Marie Kratochvil (Kratochvil, Karsyn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kratochvil, Karsyn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19805447. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Memorandum of Understanding, #2 Exhibit 2 - Standard Working Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Collection Policy and Audit Procedures)(Kratochvil, Karsyn) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
