Arends v. Blues Arrow Inc.
| Michael Arends |
| Blues Arrow Inc. |
| 1:2022cv04737 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Telephonic hearing held on 10/25/2022. Defendant's oral request for an extension of time to file an answer or otherwise plead is granted. Defendant's responsive pleading due by 11/8/2022. The parties are to file a Joint Status Report on this court's form by 11/22/2022. Telephonic status hearing set for 12/6/2022 at 9:15 a.m. Members of the public and media may listen to these proceedings by dialing (888) 684-8852 and using the access code is 1503395. Counsel of record and other essential case participants will receive an email prior to the start of the telephone hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Blues Arrow Inc. by Nick Edward Porter (Porter, Nick) |
| Filing 11 JURY Demand (Kozlov, Fedor) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Blues Arrow Inc. by Fedor Kozlov Nick E. Porter, Esq. (Kozlov, Fedor) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Blues Arrow Inc. by Fedor Kozlov (Kozlov, Fedor) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: On review of the plaintiff's initial status report #7 , telephonic hearing set for 10/25/2022 at 9:15 a.m. Members of the public and media may listen to these proceedings by dialing (888) 684-8852 and using the access code is 1503395. Counsel of record and other essential case participants will receive an email prior to the start of the telephone hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 7 STATUS Report (PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL) by Michael Arends (Morrison, David) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Plaintiff is directed to file a Status Report on or before 10/11/2022. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Arends as to Blues Arrow Inc. on 9/7/2022, answer due 9/28/2022. (Morrison, David) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mbh, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mbh, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Blues Arrow Inc. (smb, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michael Arends by Rachel C. Steiner (Steiner, Rachel) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michael Arends by David E. Morrison (Morrison, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Morrison, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Arends; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19806891.(Morrison, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arends v. Blues Arrow Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Arends | |
| Represented By: | Rachel C. Steiner |
| Represented By: | David E. Morrison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Blues Arrow Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Fedor Kozlov |
| Represented By: | Nick Edward Porter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
