Horton v. Oak Street Health Clinic MSO, LLC
Dana Horton |
Oak Street Health Clinic MSO, LLC |
1:2022cv04755 |
September 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John J Tharp |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Oak Street Health Clinic MSO, LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Second Unopposed Motion to File Responsive Pleading (Jackson, Brian) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Oak Street Health Clinic MSO, LLC by Samantha Karen Buddig (Buddig, Samantha) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Oak Street Health Clinic MSO, LLC by Samantha Karen Buddig (Buddig, Samantha) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file an answer or other responsive pleading #7 is granted. The defendant's answer or otherwise responsive pleading is due 11/3/22. The Court will, on its own initiative, also extend the due date for the parties' joint initial status report, ordered on 9/14/22 #6 , to 11/18/22. Mailed notice (air, ) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Oak Street Health Clinic MSO, LLC by Brian Keith Jackson (Jackson, Brian) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Oak Street Health Clinic MSO, LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 or Responsive Pleading (Unopposed Motion) (Jackson, Brian) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The parties are directed to review the procedures for initial status reports, located at [https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?79eF+7uiX7ewBj/ITKrjoA==] and to submit an initial status report by 10/18/2022. The report should include a proposed case management schedule reflecting any disputes between the parties as to the proposed schedule.Mailed notice (air, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dana Horton as to Oak Street Health Clinic MSO, LLC on 9/13/2022, answer due 10/4/2022. (Volheim, Nathan) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Oak Street Health Clinic MSO, LLC (mbh, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dana Horton by Chad William Eisenback (Eisenback, Chad) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dana Horton by Eric Donald Coleman (Coleman, Eric) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dana Horton by Nathan Charles Volheim (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Dana Horton; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19809829. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Volheim, Nathan) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.