Cholid v. The Boeing Company
Plaintiff: Cholid
Defendant: The Boeing Company
Case Number: 1:2022cv04895
Filed: September 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Andrea R Wood
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Airplane Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2022 Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Plaintiff having filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) #14 , this case is dismissed without prejudice. All pending hearing dates and motions are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (lma, )
October 4, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION by Plaintiff Cholid to dismiss (Hays, Andrew)
September 26, 2022 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Motion to appear pro hac vice #11 is granted. Mailed notice (lma, )
September 23, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant The Boeing Company Unopposed Motion to Set the Date to Answer or Otherwise Respond (Klein, Keith)
September 21, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19863434. (Hays, Andrew)
September 21, 2022 Filing 10 Attorney appearance form (Docket text modified by Clerk's Office) (Hays, Andrew) Modified on 9/22/2022 (cxr, ).
September 16, 2022 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Telephonic initial status hearing set for 10/12/2022 at 9:30 AM. To ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to listen to telephonic hearings. The call-in number is (888) 557-8511 and the access code is 3547847. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (lma, )
September 12, 2022 Filing 8 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (jn, )
September 12, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, )
September 12, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, )
September 9, 2022 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Mack Harrison Shultz, Jr (Shultz, Mack)
September 9, 2022 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Jillian Brett Sommers (Sommers, Jillian)
September 9, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Daniel Patrick Ridlon (Ridlon, Daniel)
September 9, 2022 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Keith G. Klein (Klein, Keith)
September 9, 2022 Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by The Boeing Company (Klein, Keith)
September 9, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Klein, Keith)
September 9, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2022-L-007529) filed by The Boeing Company Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19826859. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Klein, Keith)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cholid v. The Boeing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cholid
Represented By: Pablo Rojas
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Buck
Represented By: Steven C. Marks
Represented By: Andrew T. Hays
Represented By: Kristina Marie Infante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Boeing Company
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Ridlon
Represented By: Jillian Brett Sommers
Represented By: Keith G. Klein
Represented By: Mack Harrison Shultz, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?