Wadu et al v. The Boeing Company
ZET WADU, NI LUH SUDARNI, ARDY SAMUEL CORNELIS WADU and Mia Tresetyani Wadu |
The Boeing Company |
1:2022cv04896 |
September 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John F Kness |
P.I.: Airplane Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is the parties' agreed motion to stay proceedings #16 . In the light of Boeing's pending motion to consolidate this case with 21-cv-01475, the parties' agreed motion to stay proceedings is granted. Plaintiffs' motion to remand #14 is entered and continued. The status hearing set for 11/29/2022 is stricken. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
Filing 16 MOTION by Defendant The Boeing Company to stay AGREED (Klein, Keith) |
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: In view of the joint status report #11 filed by the parties and Plaintiffs' motion to remand #14 , the hearing set for 10/13/2022 at 10:10 AM is stricken and reset to 11/29/2022 at 10:10 AM. Defendant's response to the remand motion must be filed on or before 11/4/2022, and Plaintiffs' reply (if any) must be filed on or before 11/18/2022. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
Filing 14 MOTION by Plaintiffs Ni Luh Sudarni, Mia Tresetyani Wadu, Ardy Samuel Cornelis Wadu, Zet Wadu to remand (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Routh, Thomas) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ni Luh Sudarni, Mia Tresetyani Wadu, Ardy Samuel Cornelis Wadu, Zet Wadu by Thomas Patrick Routh (Routh, Thomas) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant's Motion for extension of time to answer #10 is granted. Defendant must answer or otherwise plead on or before 11/8/2022. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
Filing 11 STATUS Report JOINT by The Boeing Company (Klein, Keith) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant The Boeing Company to Set Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (Unopposed) (Klein, Keith) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 9/16/2022: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 10/13/2022 at 10:10 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than ten days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice(ef, ) (Main Document 9 replaced on 9/26/2022) (ef, ). |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kl, ) |
Filing 8 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (kl, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, ) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Mack Harrison Shultz, Jr (Shultz, Mack) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Jillian Brett Sommers (Sommers, Jillian) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Daniel Patrick Ridlon (Ridlon, Daniel) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Keith G. Klein (Klein, Keith) |
Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by The Boeing Company (Klein, Keith) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Klein, Keith) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2022-L-007384) filed by The Boeing Company Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19826893. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Klein, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.