Vidiri v. Paylocity Corporation
| Richard Vidiri |
| Paylocity Corporation |
| 1:2022cv04920 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by Paylocity Corporation(Poplawski, Carol) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint #9 is granted. Responsive pleading to be filed by 11/10/2022. No appearance necessary on 10/12/2022. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Paylocity Corporation (Poplawski, Carol) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Carol A. Poplawski for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 10/12/2022 at 09:15 AM. (Poplawski, Carol) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Paylocity Corporation for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Poplawski, Carol) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Paylocity Corporation by Carol A. Poplawski (Poplawski, Carol) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Vidiri as to Paylocity Corporation on 9/20/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. (De Arcangelis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Richard Vidiri by Charles Ryan Morgan (Morgan, Charles) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Richard Vidiri of Filing Consent to Join (Attachments: #1 Consent to Join - Richard Vidiri)(De Arcangelis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Telephone status hearing is set for 11/18/2022 at 10:15 AM. The call-in number is (877)336-1829 and the access code is 5205245. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Plaintiff is directed to advise the defendant of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. If the parties agree to consent jurisdiction before the Magistrate Judge, all parties must sign the consent form and electronically file the signed form on the case docket. The court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Paylocity Corporation (dxb, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Richard Vidiri by Kimberly De Arcangelis (De Arcangelis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (De Arcangelis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard Vidiri; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19830346.(De Arcangelis, Kimberly) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (rc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vidiri v. Paylocity Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Vidiri | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly De Arcangelis |
| Represented By: | Charles Ryan Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Paylocity Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Carol A. Poplawski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
