Morgan v. The Kroger Co. et al
| Kathy D Morgan |
| The Kroger Co. and Ralphs Grocery Company doing business as Food 4 Less |
| 1:2022cv04990 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Beth W Jantz |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Beegle, Jennifer) |
| Filing 13 Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants' Affirmative Defenses by Kathy D Morgan (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Lee, Jeremy) |
| Filing 12 DEFENDANTS' ANSWER to Complaint by Ralphs Grocery Company, The Kroger Co.(Beegle, Jennifer) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Beth W. Jantz: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jantz for all further proceedings #10 . The parties are directed to review this Court's standing order on initial status conferences, though they need not file an initial status report because one was filed recently. Initial disclosures to issue by 11/30/22. Initial written discovery requests to issue by 12/23/22. Fact discovery deadline set for 3/31/23. The Court notes that defendants' responses to the complaint were due previously. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(2). Defendants to file responses to the complaint by 11/1/22. An initial telephonic status conference is set for 2/9/23 at 1:30 p.m. To join the status conference by phone, counsel shall dial 888-273-3658 and enter access code 2217918. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing as well. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (as, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Beth W. Jantz pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 10/17/2022. (cxr, )
|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the consent to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction (conveyed in the status report, R. 8, and confirmed in emails from both parties to the courtroom deputy), the status hearing with Judge Chang of 10/21/2022 is vacated. The consent will be processed with the Executive Committee. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 8 STATUS Report JOINT INITIAL by Ralphs Grocery Company, The Kroger Co. (Beegle, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 10/21/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 10/13/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kathy D Morgan by Jeremy Daniel Lee (Lee, Jeremy) |
| Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record.(cxr, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois, case number (2022L006638) filed by Ralphs Grocery Company, The Kroger Co. filing fee $402, receipt number AILNDC-19840453. (Beegle, Jennifer) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by All Defendants (Beegle, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Ralphs Grocery Company d/b/a Food 4 Less, The Kroger Co. by Jennifer R Beegle (Beegle, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Beegle, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
