Kovacevic v. Motivate LLC et al
| Milica Kovacevic |
| Motivate LLC, Lyft, Inc., Motivate LLC doing business as Motivate Services, LLC and Lyft, Inc. doing business as Lyft Illinois, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv05004 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 AMENDED notice of removal #1 (Joint) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G)(Maruna, James) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Defendant Motivate LLC's unopposed motion for substitution of counsel #8 is granted. Attorneys Richard C. Huettel, James F. Maruna, and Michael P. Moothart are given leave to withdraw as counsel for Defendant Motivate LLC. Attorneys David M. Bennett and Rick Kenyon are given leave to file appearances on behalf of Defendant Motivate LLC. Defendant Motivate LLC's Motion for extension of time to file removal notice in light of new counsel #10 is granted to 10/21/22. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Motivate LLC by Richard Patrick Kenyon (Kenyon, Richard) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Motivate LLC for extension of time to file Removal Notice in Light of New Counsel (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Motivate LLC by David M. Bennett (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Motivate LLC to substitute attorney (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Lyft, Inc., Motivate LLC by Michael Patrick Moothart (Moothart, Michael) |
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court grants defendants 28 days in which to file an amended notice of removal that adequately alleges a proper basis for this Court's jurisdiction, lest this case be remanded. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 9/20/2022. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, )
|
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Lyft, Inc., Motivate LLC by Richard Charles Huettel (Huettel, Richard) |
| Filing 4 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (cxr, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Lyft, Inc., Motivate LLC by James F. Maruna (Maruna, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Maruna, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2022L006283) filed by Lyft, Inc., Motivate LLC Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19841973. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E)(Maruna, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
